Charly 3D Tutors

  In this video, I am showing a render-test of the new Redshift 3.0.41 on my recent project, which is already familiar to you from my previous tests. Since it has a new Hair Physical Material based on Disney research and I wanted to check how much slower it will render. Why was I already sure it was slower? Because many have already complained at the forum, but also since the material has become physically correct - naturally, it transmits more light and requires big miscalculations. But honestly, I didn't really get into all this .. I'm not a physicist or a mathematician. I am a creator with a creative mindset .. Therefore, for me - if only it renders beautifully and quickly, and what is there in physics and what processes are taking place is not very interesting =) Info about RTX SpeedUP - https://bit.ly/2R98DwF   The release of new NVIDIA Studio drivers also pushed me to this test. After all, Optix 7.2 was added to them, in which they promised to speed up the rendering of...

  I continue to record my tests on the GPU. This time I decided to test my recent project on 2x2080TI + NVLink. Shown a variant with CUDA and RTX. But there is clearly something wrong with RTX, since, logically, the scene should be rendered 2-4 times faster, because this happens on ordinary scenes without hair. But apparently, the rendering has the same problem as ChaosGroup with V-Ray. Hopefully, it will be fixed in future releases. I mentioned this bug on the forum - https://www.redshift3d.com/forums/viewthread/33548/ This video has no purpose to humiliate other renderings. I have already repeated this 100 times and will repeat it again. I'm just curious to check the performance of different renders in different situations - on my video cards. And yet - I have no purpose to compare renders. I do not like to do this, because I believe that everyone is good in their own way and everyone has their own advantages, and I never pay attention to the minuses. Therefore, I'm reco...