Charly 3D Tutors

  In this video, I'm showing a render-test of the new Redshift 3.0.43 on my dog project. The increase in speed on this scene: in one test - x1.7, and in the other x2.8 !!! And this is awesome! Since with the last test with the scorpion girl - I was a little upset, I was doing different tests all weekend - and threw them here on the forum - https://www.redshift3d.com/forums/viewthread/33548/#226035   During the tests, I came to the conclusion that RTX ON still needs to be improved in Redshift and not all tests are successful. We are already discussing these points with NVidia and the Redshift Team. I think that in subsequent releases, the situation will improve on those scenes that did not show acceleration ... Perhaps the reason for the slowdown in RTX ON in previous tests was the choice of the Hilbert method + increasing the bucket size to 256 ... I don't know. We need to check ... But here I left the default method - Spiral and bucket = 128 and it got a strong acceleration...

  In this video, I am showing a render-test of the new Redshift 3.0.41 on my recent project, which is already familiar to you from my previous tests. Since it has a new Hair Physical Material based on Disney research and I wanted to check how much slower it will render. Why was I already sure it was slower? Because many have already complained at the forum, but also since the material has become physically correct - naturally, it transmits more light and requires big miscalculations. But honestly, I didn't really get into all this .. I'm not a physicist or a mathematician. I am a creator with a creative mindset .. Therefore, for me - if only it renders beautifully and quickly, and what is there in physics and what processes are taking place is not very interesting =) Info about RTX SpeedUP - https://bit.ly/2R98DwF   The release of new NVIDIA Studio drivers also pushed me to this test. After all, Optix 7.2 was added to them, in which they promised to speed up the rendering of...

ChaosGroup recently released a new update to their Project Lavina raytracing engine, now called Chaos Vantage. In this video, I'll show you how: → Get a free license until June 2021. → Use LiveLink in 3ds Max I will also compare the performance of the V-Ray 5 GPU IPR and the new viewport in Chaos Vantage. More tutorials: - Chaos Vantage → http://bit.ly/2TMPS0F - V-Ray → https://bit.ly/3aQHIgU - 3ds Max → https://bit.ly/3hANhRF Video content: 0:00 - Greetings. Lesson topic. 0:27 - Important information about channel support 0:51 - What is "Chaos Vantage"? 1:20 - How to get a free license until June 2021? 1:56 - System Recommendations 3:17 - Installation, configuration, etc. 4:26 - Test of a simple scene and Chaos Vantage 3ds max live link. 6:10 - Test scene from Evermotion 8:07 - Comparison of V-Ray GPU IPR and Chaos Vantage IPR 11:23 - Forrender Renderfarm 11:30 - Promo code to use 15% lifetime discount on our render farm. 11:33 - Info-partners 11:35 - Ending and...

  I continue to record my tests on the GPU. This time I decided to test my recent project on 2x2080TI + NVLink. Shown a variant with RTX.  Standard GPU settings = 9 min. This video has no purpose to humiliate other renderings. I have already repeated this 100 times and will repeat it again. I'm just curious to check the performance of different renders in different situations - on my video cards. And yet - I have no purpose to compare renders. I do not like to do this, because I believe that everyone is good in their own way and everyone has their own advantages, and I never pay attention to the minuses. Therefore, I'm recording a series of videos - not just comparing each of them, but the individual tests of each render on specific scenes. Happy viewing! Other benchmarks - https://bit.ly/35QQVB5             Stay tuned for updates: ★Instagram - http://instagram.com/akcharly_art ★Twitter - https://twitter.com/artofcha...

  I continue to record my tests on the GPU. This time I decided to test my recent project on 2x2080TI + NVLink. Shown a variant with CUDA and RTX. But there is clearly something wrong with RTX, since, logically, the scene should be rendered 2-4 times faster, because this happens on ordinary scenes without hair. But apparently, the rendering has the same problem as ChaosGroup with V-Ray. Hopefully, it will be fixed in future releases. I mentioned this bug on the forum - https://www.redshift3d.com/forums/viewthread/33548/ This video has no purpose to humiliate other renderings. I have already repeated this 100 times and will repeat it again. I'm just curious to check the performance of different renders in different situations - on my video cards. And yet - I have no purpose to compare renders. I do not like to do this, because I believe that everyone is good in their own way and everyone has their own advantages, and I never pay attention to the minuses. Therefore, I'm reco...

  I continue to record my tests on the GPU. This time I decided to test my recent project on 2x2080TI + NVLink. I showed only the option with CUDA because there is a bug in RTX that slows down the rendering of hair by 3 times. I wrote about this here on the forum - https://forums.chaosgroup.com/forum/v-ray-for-maya-forums/v-ray-for-maya-general/1080189-rtx-speed-increase This video has no purpose to humiliate other renderings. I have already repeated this 100 times and will repeat it again. I'm just curious to check the performance of different renders in different situations - on my video cards. And yet - I have no purpose to compare renders. I do not like to do this, because I believe that everyone is good in their own way and everyone has their own advantages, and I never pay attention to the minuses. Therefore, I'm recording a series of videos - not just comparing each of them, but the individual tests of each render on specific scenes. Happy viewing! More tests - http...

Since NVLink in Octane Render doesn't work with the test that it already did on V-Ray and Redshift, I decided to just check Instances and the speed of the new version. In principle, I think that the subsequent tests will already be done with Instance. Since, a few people use copies, and this was purely for interest, in order to take maximum GPU-memory. After all, then - I didn't come up with anything else =) As a result, Octane behaves calmly at 4 billion, I think, like other renders with Instance. But 3dsmax is buggy in statistics and goes into some obscure minuses.

Since literally all render developers add NVLink support, I decided to test it in Redshift 3.0.21. Because on this version - I noticed a strong jump in speed in Redshift Render. Many even talk about this on the forum =) The essence of the test is to fill the entire memory of one 2080Ti so that NVLink works and starts taking the missing memory from the second video card. Since Instance doesn't take up a lot of memory - I do a Copies. If you wish, you can enable Instance and render billions, but the essence of the test is not the point. I know about the Array Tool and when I tried it - Max crashed immediately, even on Object -Display as Box. So I carefully copied using Shift so that nothing would fly out. So far I decided to test without textures. The following tests will already be with them. And yet - I have no purpose to compare renders. I do not like to do this, because I believe that everyone is good in their own way and everyone has their own advantages, and I ...

This is a fast test with new ChaosGroup V-Ray 5 Beta and 400 million polys on 2x2080Ti + NVLink test in 3ds Max.